It is important to quantify the deformation of structures under loading to ensure it meets design specifications. For instance, you wouldn’t want the Sydney Harbour Bridge to be sagging by 5 m when cars pass through it! Might seem like an exaggeration, but you get the idea.
Deformation must also be considered relative to its own length. A 10 mm deformation in a rod might not seem big but if the rod’s original length is 20 mm, then it’s a 50% relative deformation! Similarly a 50 mm deflection in a beam might seem huge but if the beam is 15 m in length, then the deflection is acceptable.
The concept of “relative deformation” is what we call strain. We will consider both normal and shear strains.
It is important to quantify the deformation of structures under loading to ensure it meets design specifications. For instance, you wouldn’t want the Sydney Harbour Bridge to be sagging by 5 m when cars pass through it! Might seem like an exaggeration, but you get the idea.
Deformation must also be considered relative to its own length. A 10 mm deformation in a rod might not seem big but if the rod’s original length is 20 mm, then it’s a 50% relative deformation! Similarly a 50 mm deflection in a beam might seem huge but if the beam is 15 m in length, then the deflection is acceptable.
The concept of “relative deformation” is what we call strain. We will consider both normal and shear strains.
Consider a stretched rod as follows:
Shear strain is trickier. Rather than considering the change in length, we look at the “tilt” of the body under a shear load:
Let’s look at an example now.
Consider a stretched rod as follows:
Shear strain is trickier. Rather than considering the change in length, we look at the “tilt” of the body under a shear load:
Let’s look at an example now.